It’s that time of year. Yeah, we know, it’s neither new nor original to do top ten lists – but it’s still fun. Except when it isn’t.
How much fun can it be to review all those times in the past year when we’ve been kicked in the teeth? That’s right. Here are our top
We’re back again with our manifestly unoriginal, but still interesting, idea of top ten lists for the best and worst decisions in our niche for 2008. It’s a way of recapping our second full calendar year in the blogosphere. Sure, there’s a little bit of time left in 2008, but that isn’t stopping anybody else,
We’re doing it again. We’ve prepared our top ten lists for 2008 – the top ten best, and the bottom ten worst drug and medical device product liability decisions of the year – our second full turn of the calendar in the blogosphere. You might think we’d start with the top ten, but that would
We can’t resist.
Posting the best and worst product liability decisions of 2007 isn’t enough.
How about the best pharmaceutical stories — legal or non-legal — of the year?
But we’re not pulling on the laboring oar for this one; we’re just searching the web.
Over at Pharma’s Market on CNBC.com, Mike Huckman thinks about
Yesterday, we offered our choices for the ten worst drug and device product liability cases of 2007.
Today, it’s the other side of the coin: Our choices for the best ten decisions of the year.
May we have the envelope, please:
1. International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 68 Welfare Fund v. Merck &
We have two lists: our top ten best, and our bottom ten worst, drug and medical device product liability decisions of 2007. We thought briefly about starting off with the top ten, but we realized that closing out the year with the bottom ten would put us in a bad mood. So we’re reversing the