Photo of Bexis

Remember that weird case where the plaintiff was suing because the defendant removed a drug he liked from the market?  Well, it was affirmed the other day, by the Eleventh Circuit.  See Lacognata v. Hospira, Inc., No. 12-14078, slip op. (11th Cir. June 7, 2013) (unpublished).  The affirmance isn’t much – all of one paragraph – but it expressly affirms “for the reasons stated in the district court’s order.”   As we discussed in our previous post, there were some interesting propositions, mostly about Florida law, in that district court opinion, which have now received the blessing of the relevant court of appeals.  Could be useful.