A few months ago we posted about how the Supreme Court’s decision in Jacobson v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) held up against challenges to COVID-19 vaccine mandates. The decision—which upheld a smallpox vaccination order over 100 years ago—has fared very well. Jacobson’s recognition that “society based on the rule that each one is a law unto himself would soon be confronted with disorder and anarchy” applies today as much as it did in 1905. Id. at 26. Today’s post addresses another COVID-19 decision relying on Jacobson to uphold vaccine mandates instituted for healthcare workers. Continue Reading Jacobson Remains Solid: Ninth Circuit Upholds Vaccine Mandate
Equal Protection
Federal Court Confirms that Anti-Vaxxers Do Not Have a Constitutional or Statutory Right to Endanger Everyone Else.
By Andrew Tauber on
Last year we recounted a decision that denied a preliminary injunction to selfish New Mexicans who think that they have a right to endanger others by refusing to be vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19. Specifically the court denied relief to a registered nurse who claimed that she has a right to treat…
Federal Court: Anti-Vaxxers Do Not Have a Constitutional or Statutory Right to Endanger Everyone Else
By Andrew Tauber on
Today we discuss a putative class action in which the named plaintiffs are a registered nurse who refuses to take a basic precaution to protect her vulnerable patients and a mother who is more interested in displaying her livestock than protecting her neighbors. Brought on behalf of all New Mexico residents who are equally selfish,…