A recent order from the Northern District of Illinois shows just how far public entities will go in trying to spread blame for opioid use and abuse, and in Baltimore City Board of School Commissioners v. Publicis Health, LLC, the district court found that a group of school districts reached too far. No. 24
Our clients generally prefer arbitration to litigation. Arbitration is less expensive, has much more balanced discovery, and it’s faster. It’s probably not statistically significant, but we think we’ve seen an uptick in cases in our practice footprint involving arbitration clauses. The cases we’ve blogged about recently involve some kind of direct interaction with a patient where a manufacturer can include an arbitration clause in the terms of a contract. Examples include the on-line sale of dental aligners and a glucose monitoring app for a patient’s smartphone. Today’s decision, Johnson v. Luminary Genetics, 2026 WL 2886002 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2026), is another instance where a manufacturer included an arbitration clause in its contract with a consumer—this time in the context of genetic testing.
Continue Reading Arbitration and Genetic Testing
The order certifying a class of third-party payors in the long-running Avandia MDL was the wrong result for the wrong reasons, and the Third Circuit has now vacated that order in an opinion that is well worth the read. In In Re: Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation, No. 25-2278, 2026 WL
As one court succinctly put it over a decade ago: “No federal appellate court has approved a nationwide personal injury, product liability or medical monitoring class.” Durocher v. NCAA, 2015 WL 1505675, at *10 (S.D. Ind. Mar. 31, 2015). That remains true today—and the plaintiff in Lester v. Abiomed, Inc., 2026 WL
Cannabis is big business, so it was only a matter of time before someone filed a consumer class action claiming that his cannabis was schwag. It happened in Illinois, where a judge in the Northern District promptly shot it down—not because the plaintiff’s theory was necessarily wrong, but because his theory of deception was a
Sometimes we feel as though we have gone back in time. The Super Bowl is in San Francisco this week, as it was 10 years ago, although this time around, the atrium lobby of our building has been converted into an ESPN studio. We are the temporary home of the Rich Eisen Show, with the
It’s been a been a while – some five years – since we discussed cross-jurisdictional class action tolling. That’s mostly because, aside from the occasional result-oriented atrocity that occurred in the Valsartan MDL, class actions are no longer a top-shelf problem in prescription medical product liability litigation. But it’s still nice to report on a
Just because something is common doesn’t mean it’s predominate, and it definitely doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. Colds are common. So are traffic jams, mosquitos, and people who say, “Let’s circle back.” None of those things are dominant forces of greatness—they’re just annoyances we’ve sadly grown used to. Like plaintiffs seeking to certify products
The Avandia MDL has been a long, winding, and ultimately meritless road. The FDA approved the drug to treat Type II diabetes in 1999, and the MDL got going in 2007, after a widely publicized, but ultimately disproven meta-analysis purported to show that Avandia presented an increased risk of heart attacks.
That was 18 years
